|
Post by tom01313 on Jan 22, 2007 23:23:49 GMT
you are correct
|
|
Commander Vorak
Commander
Science Officer
Live long and prosper...
Posts: 1,657
|
Post by Commander Vorak on Jan 22, 2007 23:26:27 GMT
For this reason I think it should be called staller catography as it was in Generations
|
|
|
Post by Rudger McVanlen on Jan 22, 2007 23:29:35 GMT
ohh...well still the wrighters were dorks, theres ALOT they missed, its simply that if humans design something its gonna have certain things... and they tryed to have EVERYTHING on the bridge, witch is silly... anyway my point is that the wrighters were dorks and didint add alot of things they should have.
|
|
|
Post by zepplin on Jan 23, 2007 7:13:49 GMT
right... well the point is, without them the show would never have existed, I defend the writers, were it not for them all those classic lovable episodes I watched wouldn't be even a thought rigt now, god, I could 'actually' be studying!
|
|
|
Post by Rudger McVanlen on Jan 23, 2007 7:37:15 GMT
heh they were good, ney great at wrighting storys, but they still were dorks when it came to designing ships. dont get me wrong im not a noob whos like "Star trek ships suck and are imposable" im more like "Their kick ass..but are imposable" witch they are, anti-matter is used compleatly wrong, yes it can provide alot of power, but mixing it with matter wouldint just make energy...it would vaporize the ship. and transporters are imposable, ahh theres a scientist that explained why but basicly they cant exist, do i love how their used still? yes. see i agree the show rules, and the tech is cool, but the wrighters made ALOT of mistakes, and tech that cant exist... enless theres another diminsion in witch the laws of physics are differint, in witch case mabey there star trek could be real. one thing i will stick up for being real however is the most ripped on tech, warp. Though it is possable to use it the energy required is something like 100,000 times the power output of the sun. hey you try bending space itself XD. anyway my point is the show dos kick ass, and has lots of cool stuff done by the wrighters, but they messed stuff...namely the astro lab once again i stress the point that i love the show, but the wrighters were still off on a few things.
|
|
|
Post by zepplin on Jan 23, 2007 8:25:11 GMT
HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Vaporise the ship!?!
HA HA HA!!!
My god, I am just about to explode its that funny, not to mention stupid suggetion, Lt. Look up Anti-matter physics, it produces pure energy... BL HA HA HA! Sorry, cant explain how funny this is that you think that. It is very much possible, but many years away for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Rudger McVanlen on Jan 23, 2007 8:34:52 GMT
...ok and what site did you read that from? star trek.net? lol ask any real scientist they will back me up..wait..no im backing THEM up..i didint make this up dude..anti-matter and matter do make HELLA energy...but just 1 atom of either conecting would vaporize the state of navada...why do i know this? becuse i have spent my life RESERCHING science, go find a good science site and you will learn anti-matters not to be messed with lightly...we know its the greatist power source out there so far..but geting it to not blow you up is the hard part. and you do not want to mix it with matter, as i said, one atom of matter mixing with one atom of anti-matter makes a big explosion...far larger then the greatist nuke evermade...
|
|
|
Post by Will Litchfield on Feb 3, 2007 15:32:26 GMT
Will you two shut up
|
|
|
Post by Rudger McVanlen on Feb 3, 2007 18:47:32 GMT
we did..this is old...lol
|
|
|
Post by Flt Lt Greg "HITMAN" Campbell on Feb 9, 2007 9:20:21 GMT
Yeah a Nav room would also be good revision for my pilots, just so that they don't get lost on training or in battle
|
|
Captain Alexander Kynes
Captain
Commanding Officer
"For the wise man looks into space and he knows there are no limited dimensions.?
Posts: 1,596
|
Post by Captain Alexander Kynes on Mar 3, 2007 4:59:10 GMT
What board would you like the Navigation Room to be in? We already have Stellar Cartography, and you could use that if you like. I don't believe that it's been used much.
|
|